Criterion 6

CRITERION 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management (100)

Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership

Metric No. Description Weightage
6.1.1 The Institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with Vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, de-centralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their Short term and Long term institutional perspective plan. 15

 

 

Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment

Metric No. Description Weightage
6.2.1 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the Institutional bodies are effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative set-up, appointment, service rules, procedures etc. 5
6.2.2 Institution Implements e-governance in its operations 5

 

 

Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies

Metric No. Description Weightage
6.3.1. The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression 4
6.3.2. Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years 15
6.3.3. Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)/ Management Development Programs (MDP) during the last five years 6

 

 

Key Indicator - 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization

Metric No. Description Weightage
6.4.1. Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources 4
6.4.2. Funds / Grants received from government bodies/non government and philanthropists during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) 12
6.4.3. Institution regularly conducts internal and external financial audits 4

 

 

Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS)

Metric No. Description Weightage
6.5.1. Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)/ Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes, by constantly reviewing the teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes, at periodic intervals
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes visible in terms of –
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle)
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles)		 10
6.5.2. Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance:
1. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken
2.Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted
3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
4.Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students
5. Participation in NIRF and other recognized ranking like Shanghai Ranking, QS Ranking Times Ranking etc
6.Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies 		10
6.5.3. Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle NAAC A/A)
Post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles of NAAC A/A)		 10